<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Commodity Blog &#187; Commodity Prices &#8211; Steel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commodityblog.com/category/commodity-prices-steel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commodityblog.com</link>
	<description>Commodity Prices and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rains in Australia Make Steel Producers Worried Over Coal Supply</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rains-in-australia-make-steel-producers-worried-of-coal-supply</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rains-in-australia-make-steel-producers-worried-of-coal-supply#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Meteorology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commodityblog.com/?p=7969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forecasters predict coal may surge to&#160;a&#160;record on&#160;prospects of&#160;heavy rains in&#160;Australia. The&#160;Australian Bureau of&#160;Meteorology estimated the&#160;chance for&#160;above-average precipitation in&#160;Northern Queensland to&#160;be 65 to&#160;70 percent. The&#160;previous La Nina, which was the&#160;most expensive natural disaster for&#160;Australia, spurred coal prices to&#160;$330 per ton. Forecasters expect rainfall to&#160;weaker than the&#160;record rains in&#160;the&#160;previous season, but it&#8217;s still remains a&#160;reason to&#160;worry. Producers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forecasters predict coal may surge to&nbsp;a&nbsp;record on&nbsp;prospects of&nbsp;heavy rains in&nbsp;Australia.</p>
<p>The&nbsp;Australian <a href="http://www.bom.gov.au/">Bureau of&nbsp;Meteorology</a> estimated the&nbsp;chance for&nbsp;<nobr>above-average</nobr> precipitation in&nbsp;Northern Queensland to&nbsp;be 65 to&nbsp;70 percent. The&nbsp;previous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Niña">La Nina</a>, which was the&nbsp;most expensive natural disaster for&nbsp;Australia, spurred coal prices to&nbsp;$330 per ton. Forecasters expect rainfall to&nbsp;weaker than the&nbsp;record rains in&nbsp;the&nbsp;previous season, but it&#8217;s still remains a&nbsp;reason to&nbsp;worry.</p>
<p>Producers of&nbsp;steel have a&nbsp;particular reason to&nbsp;worry as&nbsp;there is deficit of&nbsp;coal reserves at&nbsp;steel mills. Every ton of&nbsp;crude steel requires about 600 kilograms of&nbsp;coking coal.</p>
<p>Some analysts think that in&nbsp;case of&nbsp;disruption of&nbsp;coal supply prices may jump as&nbsp;high as&nbsp;$350 per metric ton.<br />
(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rains-in-australia-make-steel-producers-worried-of-coal-supply">Rains in Australia Make Steel Producers Worried Over Coal Supply</a> (12 words)</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rains-in-australia-make-steel-producers-worried-of-coal-supply/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forecasts for Soybeans Import, Oil Shortages, Steel Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-oil/forecasts-for-soybeans-import-oil-shortages-steel-demand</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-oil/forecasts-for-soybeans-import-oil-shortages-steel-demand#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Soybean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply and demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commodityblog.com/?p=2329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analysts predict that soybeans imports in&#160;China may remain high in&#160;March as&#160;&#8221;lower costs boost crushing margins&#8221;. The&#160;margin rose to&#160;$46 per metric ton by&#160;January 13th. Imports of&#160;soybeans in&#160;China are expected to&#160;reach 4.2 million tons in&#160;January causing concern about oversupply. Some analysts forecast shortages for&#160;crude oil as&#160;supply is unable to&#160;catch up rebounding demand. Worldwide oil consumption will return [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analysts predict that soybeans imports in&nbsp;China may remain high in&nbsp;March as&nbsp;&#8221;lower costs boost crushing margins&#8221;. The&nbsp;margin rose to&nbsp;$46 per metric ton by&nbsp;January 13th. Imports of&nbsp;soybeans in&nbsp;China are expected to&nbsp;reach 4.2 million tons in&nbsp;January causing concern about oversupply.</p>
<p>Some analysts forecast shortages for&nbsp;crude oil as&nbsp;supply is unable to&nbsp;catch up rebounding demand. Worldwide oil consumption will return to&nbsp;<nobr>pre-crisis</nobr> level at&nbsp;the&nbsp;third quarter of&nbsp;2010, while projects for&nbsp;new oil sources are &#8220;still lagging as&nbsp;a&nbsp;result of&nbsp;the&nbsp;credit crunch&#8221;. Crude oil futures reached $78 per barrel level today in&nbsp;New York.</p>
<p>Demand for&nbsp;steel may drop with lending cuts in&nbsp;China, the&nbsp;biggest consumer in&nbsp;the&nbsp;world. Steel production in&nbsp;China increased 13 percent to&nbsp;565 million tons in&nbsp;2009 as&nbsp;demand from builders, <nobr>home-appliance</nobr> manufacturers and&nbsp;automakers was boosted by&nbsp;China&#8217;s $586 billion stimulus spending. China&#8217;s steel output may rise 5 to&nbsp;10 percent exceeding 600 million metric tons in&nbsp;2010.<br />
(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-oil/forecasts-for-soybeans-import-oil-shortages-steel-demand">Forecasts for Soybeans Import, Oil Shortages, Steel Demand</a> (12 words)</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-oil/forecasts-for-soybeans-import-oil-shortages-steel-demand/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increase of Steel &amp; Wheat Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/increase-of-steel-wheat-prices</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/increase-of-steel-wheat-prices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBoT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commodityblog.com/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steel prices in&#160;the&#160;U.S. rose for&#160;the&#160;first time this year today. The&#160;decline of&#160;steel consumption reached a&#160;bottom for&#160;the&#160;current business cycle and&#160;should begin to&#160;restore gradually as&#160;distributors began restocking their severely depleted inventories. U.S. steel rose $1.12 (3 percent) to&#160;$38.61 yesterday in&#160;NYSE. Dollar’s slide causes wheat gain today. Wheat prices increase as&#160;speculation that dollar decline will continue leads to&#160;expectations for&#160;increase [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel prices in&nbsp;the&nbsp;U.S. rose for&nbsp;the&nbsp;first time this year today. The&nbsp;decline of&nbsp;steel consumption reached a&nbsp;bottom for&nbsp;the&nbsp;current business cycle and&nbsp;should begin to&nbsp;restore gradually as&nbsp;distributors began restocking their severely depleted inventories. U.S. steel rose $1.12 (3 percent) to&nbsp;$38.61 yesterday in&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nyse.com/">NYSE</a>.</p>
<p>Dollar’s slide causes wheat gain today. Wheat prices increase as&nbsp;speculation that dollar decline will continue leads to&nbsp;expectations for&nbsp;increase in&nbsp;the&nbsp;U.S. grain export. But there is anxiety that if dollar would rebound exports can fall back. September futures for&nbsp;wheat gained $0.0525 (1 percent) to&nbsp;$5.215 per bushel by 10:41 on&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cbot.com/">CBoT</a>.<br />
(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/increase-of-steel-wheat-prices">Increase of Steel &#038; Wheat Prices</a> (12 words)</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/increase-of-steel-wheat-prices/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rio Agrees 33% Iron Ore Price Cut With Nippon Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rio-agrees-33-iron-ore-price-cut-with-nippon-steel</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rio-agrees-33-iron-ore-price-cut-with-nippon-steel#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 07:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>enivid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron ore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rio Tinto Group, the world’s second- largest iron ore exporter, agreed to a 33 percent cut in contract prices with Japan’s Nippon Steel Corp., the first decline in seven years as the global recession slashes demand. Nippon Steel, the world’s second-largest steelmaker, agreed to pay Rio 97 cents a dry metric ton unit for its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rio Tinto Group, the world’s second- largest iron ore exporter, agreed to a 33 percent cut in contract prices with Japan’s Nippon Steel Corp., the first decline in seven years as the global recession slashes demand.</p>
<p>Nippon Steel, the world’s second-largest steelmaker, agreed to pay Rio 97 cents a dry metric ton unit for its benchmark product in the year started April 1, London-based Rio said today in a statement. That’s about $61 a ton and compares with last year’s record of 144.66 cents for Rio’s Pilbara Blend fines.</p>
<p>The accord, the first major settlement this year, may be resisted by Chinese mills, the biggest producers, who’ve called for price cuts of as much as 50 percent. The worst recession since World War II has slashed demand for autos and building materials, cutting profits for steelmakers and ore producers.</p>
<p>“What looks like a pretty good deal might end up being a bit tougher when they come across the Chinese,” said Mark Pervan, a senior commodity strategist at Australia &#038; New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. in Melbourne. “Historically you could say this is a done deal, when Rio strikes with Nippon, well everyone follows, but I get a feeling maybe the Chinese have got something else in store.” (...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rio-agrees-33-iron-ore-price-cut-with-nippon-steel">Rio Agrees 33% Iron Ore Price Cut With Nippon Steel</a> (19 words)</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/rio-agrees-33-iron-ore-price-cut-with-nippon-steel/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rio Tinto Chief Economist Expects Rough Year for Commodity Prices</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-copper/rio-tinto-chief-economist-expects-rough-year-for-commodity-prices</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-copper/rio-tinto-chief-economist-expects-rough-year-for-commodity-prices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Nickel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global miner Rio Tinto expects 2009 to&#160;be a&#160;rough year in&#160;terms of&#160;both prices and&#160;volumes for&#160;key commodities, the&#160;firm&#8217;s chief economist said on&#160;Wednesday. Vivek Tulpule, speaking to&#160;Reuters on&#160;the&#160;sidelines of&#160;a&#160;conference, said a&#160;pick-up was possible in&#160;2010, though people should not be blind to&#160;the&#160;risk of&#160;a&#160;prolonged slowdown. Rio Tinto&#8217;s major commodities are iron ore, aluminium and&#160;copper. &#8220;2009 will be a&#160;very rough year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global miner Rio Tinto expects 2009 to&nbsp;be a&nbsp;rough year in&nbsp;terms of&nbsp;both prices and&nbsp;volumes for&nbsp;key <strong>commodities</strong>, the&nbsp;firm&#8217;s chief economist said on&nbsp;Wednesday.<br />
Vivek Tulpule, speaking to&nbsp;Reuters on&nbsp;the&nbsp;sidelines of&nbsp;a&nbsp;conference, said a&nbsp;<nobr>pick-up</nobr> was possible in&nbsp;2010, though people should not be blind to&nbsp;the&nbsp;risk of&nbsp;a&nbsp;prolonged slowdown.<br />
Rio Tinto&#8217;s major commodities are iron ore, aluminium and&nbsp;copper.<br />
&#8220;2009 will be a&nbsp;very rough year for&nbsp;both prices and&nbsp;volumes and&nbsp;probably also for&nbsp;construction. A&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;people I&nbsp;talk to&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;mining industry are suffering a&nbsp;crisis of&nbsp;confidence, they are putting a&nbsp;lot of&nbsp;projects on&nbsp;hold,&#8221; Mr Tulpule said.<br />
&#8220;Our view is that it will be a&nbsp;slow year or&nbsp;two.&#8221;<br />
Copper, zinc, nickel and&nbsp;other industrial staples have lost 50 per cent or&nbsp;more in&nbsp;value since last year&#8217;s collapse in&nbsp;commodities markets.<br />
For&nbsp;iron ore, analysts predict benchmark prices could contract by&nbsp;as&nbsp;much as&nbsp;60 per cent this year due to&nbsp;sharp drops in&nbsp;orders from steel mills.<br />
Mr Tulpule said benefits flowing from China&#8217;s giant economic stimulus package, largely directed at&nbsp;infrastructure, were likely to&nbsp;show up midway through the&nbsp;year.<br />
&#8220;It will take to&nbsp;time to&nbsp;offset the&nbsp;negative impact of&nbsp;a&nbsp;downturn in&nbsp;exports and&nbsp;construction, those areas have slowed very fast,&#8221; Mr Tulpule said.<br />
He said the&nbsp;collapse in&nbsp;commodities flowed from two &#8220;crunches&#8221;: the&nbsp;global credit crunch and&nbsp;a&nbsp;crunch in&nbsp;China that had been induced by&nbsp;its attempts to&nbsp;slow the&nbsp;economy last year because of&nbsp;concerns it was overheating.<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;effect that had was way beyond their own expectations and&nbsp;certainly beyond the&nbsp;expectations of&nbsp;anyone else,&#8221; Mr Tupule said.<br />
&#8220;That deceleration had a&nbsp;profound effect on&nbsp;our markets as&nbsp;when growth decelerates inventories build up, and&nbsp;when you&#8217;ve got lots of&nbsp;inventory you suddenly decide not to&nbsp;build things and&nbsp;then you don&#8217;t need to&nbsp;buy half as&nbsp;much copper and&nbsp;aluminium and&nbsp;iron ore.&#8221;</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-copper/rio-tinto-chief-economist-expects-rough-year-for-commodity-prices/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steelmakers Must Shelve All Growth Capex Plans: Credit Suisse</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steelmakers-must-shelve-all-growth-capex-plans-credit-suisse</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steelmakers-must-shelve-all-growth-capex-plans-credit-suisse#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steel companies must consider shelving all growth capex plans as&#160;soon as&#160;possible if the&#160;global steel industry is to&#160;have a&#160;sustainable future, Credit Suisse warned in&#160;a&#160;report Wednesday. Warning of&#160;the&#160;dangers of&#160;oversupply in&#160;coming years, the&#160;bank added that failure to&#160;achieve this would ultimately lead to&#160;further forced plant closures, likely rounds of&#160;protectionism and&#160;subnormal returns for&#160;potentially the&#160;next decade at&#160;least. Explaining the&#160;new dynamic driving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Steel companies</strong> must consider shelving all growth capex plans as&nbsp;soon as&nbsp;possible if the&nbsp;global steel industry is to&nbsp;have a&nbsp;sustainable future, Credit Suisse warned in&nbsp;a&nbsp;report Wednesday.<br />
Warning of&nbsp;the&nbsp;dangers of&nbsp;oversupply in&nbsp;coming years, the&nbsp;bank added that failure to&nbsp;achieve this would ultimately lead to&nbsp;further forced plant closures, likely rounds of&nbsp;protectionism and&nbsp;subnormal returns for&nbsp;potentially the&nbsp;next decade at&nbsp;least.<br />
Explaining the&nbsp;new dynamic driving steel markets in&nbsp;the&nbsp;wake of&nbsp;a&nbsp;450 million mt drop in&nbsp;global steel demand, the&nbsp;bank said we have returned to&nbsp;<nobr>supply-led</nobr> cycles, like the&nbsp;1980s and&nbsp;1990s, where regardless of&nbsp;a&nbsp;potential 3&#8211;5% global demand growth trend once the&nbsp;cycle has normalized, the&nbsp;level of&nbsp;excess capacity means that supply fluctuations will drive the&nbsp;cycle for&nbsp;steel again, and&nbsp;not demand.<br />
If the&nbsp;steel industry proceeds as&nbsp;it had planned with plant capacity additions, there is a&nbsp;real risk of&nbsp;far greater excess capacity than in&nbsp;the&nbsp;1980s and&nbsp;1990s and&nbsp;consequently utilization rates that are structurally too low to&nbsp;sustain the&nbsp;industry in&nbsp;its current form, CS warned.<br />
To&nbsp;illustrate the&nbsp;magnitude of&nbsp;the&nbsp;likely oversupply problem, CS produced forecasts of&nbsp;new capacities, predicting 90 million mt of&nbsp;capacity would be added in&nbsp;2009, 95 million mt in&nbsp;2010, 89 million mt in&nbsp;2011 and&nbsp;76 million mt in&nbsp;2012. In&nbsp;every year, China accounts for&nbsp;40&#8211;60% of&nbsp;additional capacity, with India in&nbsp;second place.</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steelmakers-must-shelve-all-growth-capex-plans-credit-suisse/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s Steel Demand May Recover in Second Quarter, Group Says</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/china%e2%80%99s-steel-demand-may-recover-in-second-quarter-group-says</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/china%e2%80%99s-steel-demand-may-recover-in-second-quarter-group-says#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steel demand in&#160;China, the&#160;world&#8217;s largest user of&#160;the&#160;metal, may improve later this year as&#160;extra state spending kicks in, with more than 60 percent of&#160;mills losing money at&#160;present, the&#160;China Iron &#038; Steel Association said. &#8220;We are pinning our hopes on&#160;the&#160;government&#8217;s stimulus measures to&#160;revive domestic demand,&#8221; Vice Chairman Luo Bingsheng told reporters today in&#160;Beijing. &#8220;Hopefully the&#160;situation can improve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel demand in&nbsp;China, the&nbsp;world&#8217;s largest user of&nbsp;the&nbsp;metal, may improve later this year as&nbsp;extra state spending kicks in, with more than 60 percent of&nbsp;mills losing money at&nbsp;present, the&nbsp;China Iron &#038; Steel Association said.<br />
&#8220;We are pinning our hopes on&nbsp;the&nbsp;government&#8217;s stimulus measures to&nbsp;revive domestic demand,&#8221; Vice Chairman Luo Bingsheng told reporters today in&nbsp;Beijing. &#8220;Hopefully the&nbsp;situation can improve in&nbsp;the&nbsp;second or&nbsp;third quarter.&#8221;<br />
China is spending 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) to&nbsp;stimulate the&nbsp;world&#8217;s <nobr>third-largest</nobr> economy and&nbsp;stave off the&nbsp;impact of&nbsp;the&nbsp;global recession, which has slashed exports. China&#8217;s cabinet on&nbsp;Jan. 14 approved guidelines to&nbsp;bolster the&nbsp;steel industry, including accelerated mergers and&nbsp;acquisitions.<br />
&#8220;We haven&#8217;t seen obvious signs of&nbsp;demand recovering in&nbsp;the&nbsp;first quarter,&#8221; said Luo. The&nbsp;stimulus package will boost government spending on&nbsp;housing and&nbsp;transportation projects, such as&nbsp;upgrading railway links.<br />
Still, Baoshan Iron &#038; Steel Co., China&#8217;s <nobr>second-biggest</nobr> stainless steel producer, has said that the&nbsp;outlook has improved. Baoshan said on&nbsp;Feb. 16 that it was boosting stainless output as&nbsp;demand from some customers &#8220;is picking up.&#8221; The&nbsp;<nobr>Shanghai-based</nobr> company last month raised steel prices for&nbsp;March delivery.<br />
 &#8216;Thin Profit&#8217;<br />
&#8220;Only some privately owned steel mills may have begun to&nbsp;make thin profit due to&nbsp;lower production costs compared with <nobr>state-run</nobr> steelmakers,&#8221; said Qi Xiangdong, the&nbsp;association&#8217;s deputy <nobr>secretary-general</nobr>.<br />
China&#8217;s steelmakers had an&nbsp;aggregate loss of&nbsp;29.1 billion yuan in&nbsp;December after losing 12.8 billion yuan in&nbsp;November and&nbsp;5.84 billion yuan in&nbsp;October, the&nbsp;China Business News said Feb. 20, citing Shan Shanghua, the&nbsp;association&#8217;s <nobr>secretary-general</nobr>.<br />
Amid waning demand from builders and&nbsp;automakers, China had 660 million tons of&nbsp;<nobr>steel-making</nobr> capacity last year, about 160 million more than production of&nbsp;500.5 million tons, the&nbsp;association said today. Crude steel output this year may be between 490 million and&nbsp;500 million tons, Luo said.<br />
The&nbsp;government may further adjust tax rebates on&nbsp;some steel products and&nbsp;remove <nobr>so-called</nobr> tolling, the&nbsp;association&#8217;s Qi said. Tolling refers to&nbsp;the&nbsp;<nobr>tax-free</nobr> import of&nbsp;goods that are processed for&nbsp;export.<br />
China&#8217;s steel association represents the&nbsp;nation&#8217;s largest mills. The&nbsp;comments from Luo and&nbsp;Qi were made at&nbsp;a&nbsp;regular media briefing in&nbsp;Beijing.</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/china%e2%80%99s-steel-demand-may-recover-in-second-quarter-group-says/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zinc Consumption in Europe Fell to Lowest Level Since at Least 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/zinc-consumption-in-europe-fell-to-lowest-level-since-at-least-2005</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/zinc-consumption-in-europe-fell-to-lowest-level-since-at-least-2005#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Zinc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zinc and&#160;lead consumption in&#160;Europe and&#160;Japan fell to&#160;their lowest levels last year since at&#160;least 2005, according to&#160;the&#160;latest figures from the&#160;International Lead &#038; Zinc Study Group (ILZSG). Consumption of&#160;refined zinc in&#160;Europe fell 232,000 tonnes&#160;&#8212; or&#160;8.1% -to&#160;2.62 million tonnes in&#160;2008 from the&#160;previous year as&#160;the&#160;economic slowdown hit galvanizers and&#160;others that use zinc, the&#160;ILZSG&#8217;s figures show. Lead usage in&#160;Europe dropped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zinc and&nbsp;lead consumption in&nbsp;Europe and&nbsp;Japan fell to&nbsp;their lowest levels last year since at&nbsp;least 2005, according to&nbsp;the&nbsp;latest figures from the&nbsp;International Lead &#038; Zinc Study Group (ILZSG). Consumption of&nbsp;refined zinc in&nbsp;Europe fell 232,000 tonnes&nbsp;&#8212; or&nbsp;8.1% -to&nbsp;2.62 million tonnes in&nbsp;2008 from the&nbsp;previous year as&nbsp;the&nbsp;economic slowdown hit galvanizers and&nbsp;others that use zinc, the&nbsp;ILZSG&#8217;s figures show. Lead usage in&nbsp;Europe dropped 126,000 tonnes to&nbsp;1.81 million tonnes, down 6.5% <nobr>year-on-year</nobr>, it said, as&nbsp;demand from the&nbsp;battery sector fell. Japanese users cut zinc consumption by&nbsp;18,000 tonnes or&nbsp;3.1% to&nbsp;570,000 tonnes, while lead consumption in&nbsp;the&nbsp;country fell 11,000 tonnes or&nbsp;3.9% to&nbsp;268,000 tonnes.<br />
Global lead usage rose 6.4% <nobr>year-on-year</nobr> to&nbsp;8.71 million tonnes, powered by&nbsp;China, where it grew by&nbsp;24.8% to&nbsp;3.21 million tonnes. Refined lead production in&nbsp;China jumped 15% to&nbsp;3.21 million tonnes last year. The&nbsp;country&#8217;s exports fell 209,000 tonnes in&nbsp;2007 to&nbsp;35,000 tonnes.<br />
Net imports of&nbsp;lead in&nbsp;concentrate rose for&nbsp;the&nbsp;sixth consecutive year to&nbsp;a&nbsp;record 795,000 tonnes, the&nbsp;ILZSG said. Demand for&nbsp;lead recovered partially in&nbsp;the&nbsp;USA, climbing 4% <nobr>year-on-year</nobr> to&nbsp;1.57 million tonnes. This was still below the&nbsp;level of&nbsp;2006, though, when the&nbsp;USA consumed 1.62 million tonnes, the&nbsp;trade body said. But worldwide production grew to&nbsp;8.73 million tonnes, creating a&nbsp;surplus of&nbsp;19,000 tonnes, the&nbsp;ILZSG said. &#8220;This is the&nbsp;first time world production has exceeded usage since 2002,&#8221; the&nbsp;ILZSG said.<br />
World refined zinc production rose 2.9% to&nbsp;11.68 million tonnes, exceeding demand by&nbsp;195,000 tonnes. &#8220;After peaking in&nbsp;June, monthly refined zinc metal output fell off during November and&nbsp;December as&nbsp;a&nbsp;consequence of&nbsp;a&nbsp;number of&nbsp;closures and&nbsp;cutbacks,&#8221; the&nbsp;trade body said. Canadian producers cut 41,000 tonnes of&nbsp;zinc output, or&nbsp;5.1%, to&nbsp;761,000 tonnes last year, it said. Producers in&nbsp;Europe slashed output by&nbsp;1.7% to&nbsp;2.47 million tonnes as&nbsp;refiners in&nbsp;China increased production by&nbsp;170,000 tonnes, or&nbsp;4.5%, to&nbsp;3.91 million tonnes. The&nbsp;country&#8217;s imports of&nbsp;zinc metal exceeded exports by&nbsp;111,000 tonnes in&nbsp;2008. This is a&nbsp;reversal of&nbsp;2007, when China&#8217;s exports were 127,000 tonnes higher than imports, the&nbsp;ILZSG said.</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/zinc-consumption-in-europe-fell-to-lowest-level-since-at-least-2005/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Steel Lauds Passage of the Big US Economic Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/big-steel-lauds-passage-of-the-big-us-economic-stimulus</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/big-steel-lauds-passage-of-the-big-us-economic-stimulus#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The&#160;US House of&#160;Representatives passed the&#160;$789-billion stimulus bill by&#160;a&#160;246 to&#160;183 vote on&#160;Friday, and&#160;the&#160;American Iron and&#160;Steel Institute praised Congress and&#160;President Obama. In&#160;a&#160;Friday statement, the&#160;Washington-based AISI pointed to&#160;key spending items included in&#160;the&#160;bill &#8220;and&#160;of&#160;note to&#160;the&#160;industry are spending on&#160;transportation and&#160;infrastructure&#8211;including industry-supported Buy America language.&#8221; &#8220;We thank President Obama for&#160;his efforts, and&#160;Congress on&#160;their expedient action to&#160;pass this stimulus package, which will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The&nbsp;US House of&nbsp;Representatives passed the&nbsp;$789-billion stimulus bill by&nbsp;a&nbsp;246 to&nbsp;183 vote on&nbsp;Friday, and&nbsp;the&nbsp;American Iron and&nbsp;Steel Institute praised Congress and&nbsp;President Obama. In&nbsp;a&nbsp;Friday statement, the&nbsp;<nobr>Washington-based</nobr> AISI pointed to&nbsp;key spending items included in&nbsp;the&nbsp;bill &#8220;and&nbsp;of&nbsp;note to&nbsp;the&nbsp;industry are spending on&nbsp;transportation and&nbsp;infrastructure&#8211;including <nobr>industry-supported</nobr> Buy America language.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;We thank President Obama for&nbsp;his efforts, and&nbsp;Congress on&nbsp;their expedient action to&nbsp;pass this stimulus package, which will help to&nbsp;put Americans back to&nbsp;work and&nbsp;get America&#8217;s economy back on&nbsp;track,&#8221; said Thomas J. Gibson, president and&nbsp;CEO, AISI.<br />
The&nbsp;<strong>steel trade</strong> group said included in&nbsp;the&nbsp;transportation and&nbsp;infrastructure spending in&nbsp;the&nbsp;bill are: $27.5 billion for&nbsp;highways and&nbsp;bridges; $8.4 billion for&nbsp;public transportation; $1.3 billion for&nbsp;aviation; $9.3 billion for&nbsp;<nobr>high-speed</nobr> rail and&nbsp;other rail investment; and&nbsp;$22 billion in&nbsp;school construction bonds.<br />
The&nbsp;AISI also emphasized that funding for&nbsp;energy programs in&nbsp;the&nbsp;bill totals $37.5 billion and&nbsp;includes upgrading the&nbsp;energy grid, research into clean coal technology and&nbsp;$6 billion in&nbsp;loan guarantees for&nbsp;renewable energy projects. It includes a&nbsp;<nobr>three-year</nobr> extension of&nbsp;the&nbsp;production tax credit for&nbsp;wind energy.<br />
In&nbsp;addition, AISI said the&nbsp;bill expands and&nbsp;extends Trade Adjustment Assistance benefits and&nbsp;includes language barring the&nbsp;Bureau of&nbsp;Customs and&nbsp;Border Protection from demanding repayment of&nbsp;duties collected under the&nbsp;Continued Dumping and&nbsp;Subsidy Offset Act on&nbsp;NAFTA goods between 2001&#8211;2005.</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/big-steel-lauds-passage-of-the-big-us-economic-stimulus/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Buy America&#8217; Clause Sparks Trade War Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/buy-america-clause-sparks-trade-war-talk</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/buy-america-clause-sparks-trade-war-talk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week&#8217;s furore over the&#160;controversial &#8216;Buy America&#8217; clause included in&#160;the&#160;American Recovery and&#160;Reinvestment Act of&#160;2009&#160;&#8212; passed by&#160;the&#160;US House of&#160;Representatives on&#160;January 28&#160;&#8212; ended the&#160;week with the&#160;White House promising to&#160;review the&#160;protectionist proposal. This latest move, which came after outcry from industry bodies and&#160;governments across the&#160;globe, is likely to&#160;be unpopular among US steelmakers, many of&#160;which came out in&#160;support of&#160;the&#160;proposal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week&#8217;s furore over the&nbsp;controversial &#8216;Buy America&#8217; clause included in&nbsp;the&nbsp;American Recovery and&nbsp;Reinvestment Act of&nbsp;2009&nbsp;&#8212; passed by&nbsp;the&nbsp;US House of&nbsp;Representatives on&nbsp;January 28&nbsp;&#8212; ended the&nbsp;week with the&nbsp;White House promising to&nbsp;review the&nbsp;protectionist proposal.<br />
This latest move, which came after outcry from industry bodies and&nbsp;governments across the&nbsp;globe, is likely to&nbsp;be unpopular among US steelmakers, many of&nbsp;which came out in&nbsp;support of&nbsp;the&nbsp;proposal during the&nbsp;week.<br />
&#8220;We need to&nbsp;put Americans back to&nbsp;work,&#8221; Nucor ceo Dan DiMicco said at&nbsp;a&nbsp;Congressional Steel Caucus hearing last week.<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;best way to&nbsp;do that is with a&nbsp;strong stimulus package that focuses on&nbsp;rebuilding our nation&#8217;s infrastructure, including our roads, our bridges, our schools and&nbsp;our buildings, as&nbsp;well as&nbsp;our energy infrastructure, both conventional and&nbsp;alternative.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;&#8217;Buy America&#8217; laws are consistent, I&nbsp;repeat consistent, with our international obligations,&#8221; he added.<br />
&#8220;They have not and&nbsp;will not start a&nbsp;trade war.&#8221;<br />
Chairman of&nbsp;the&nbsp;Congressional Steel Caucus Representative Peter Visclosky, a&nbsp;champion of&nbsp;stronger provisions, agreed.<br />
Bottom line<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;bottom line is that requiring American steel to&nbsp;be used in&nbsp;economic stimulus projects is a&nbsp;surefire way to&nbsp;quickly create American jobs, and&nbsp;the&nbsp;American taxpayers deserve to&nbsp;know that their <nobr>hard-earned</nobr> tax dollars are being used to&nbsp;revitalise the&nbsp;American economy and&nbsp;help Americans who want to&nbsp;work,&#8221; he said.<br />
But others elsewhere were not so sure, and&nbsp;a&nbsp;number of&nbsp;foreign government bodies, including the&nbsp;European Commission, welcomed President Obama&#8217;s new tack on&nbsp;the&nbsp;proposed trade legislation, particularly when the&nbsp;US premier took a&nbsp;softer tone in&nbsp;an&nbsp;interview with Fox News.<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m encouraged by&nbsp;the&nbsp;words of&nbsp;President Obama,&#8221; European trade commissioner Baroness Ashton told MB. &#8220;He realises, like we do in&nbsp;Europe, that we need to&nbsp;<strong>trade</strong> our way out of&nbsp;the&nbsp;current economic difficulties. Trade is part of&nbsp;the&nbsp;solution as&nbsp;it acts as&nbsp;a&nbsp;stimulus.&#8221;<br />
But the&nbsp;&#8217;Buy America&#8217; clause has ruffled feathers in&nbsp;more than one nation outside Europe, and&nbsp;Obama and&nbsp;his administration will have to&nbsp;tread carefully if they wish not to&nbsp;trigger further ire in&nbsp;these quarters.<br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s trade protectionism, which is against the&nbsp;common practice of&nbsp;the&nbsp;World Trade Organisation, but then, so far, it has been more propaganda than reality, so it is still too early to&nbsp;make any formal protest,&#8221; said an&nbsp;official at&nbsp;China Iron &#038; Steel Assn (Cisa).<br />
&#8220;In&nbsp;a&nbsp;global economy, the&nbsp;market should be the&nbsp;decision- maker, not the&nbsp;government. Even China, a&nbsp;500 million tpy steelmaker, has to&nbsp;import some products every year, how can the&nbsp;US be different?,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;The&nbsp;US triggered the&nbsp;financial crisis and&nbsp;global economic recession, which has hit Europe harder. All countries are making an&nbsp;effort to&nbsp;help each other out, and&nbsp;[if the&nbsp;US passes 'Buy America' provisions] it will turn all the&nbsp;other countries against the&nbsp;US,&#8221; he said.<br />
And&nbsp;Serdar Kocturk, president of&nbsp;the&nbsp;Turkish Steel Exporters&#8217; Assn, was similarly unimpressed.<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;law favours American producers in&nbsp;government tenders. In&nbsp;this act there are some countries called &#8216;designated countries&#8217; which are treated like local suppliers. If there is a&nbsp;public interest, if the&nbsp;product is not available and&nbsp;if the&nbsp;cost is unreasonable, some products may be excluded with prior approval,&#8221; he told MB.<br />
Trade barriers<br />
&#8220;In&nbsp;the&nbsp;past, prices up to&nbsp;6% higher were acceptable for&nbsp;local suppliers. I&nbsp;think that such protective laws are against free trade practices and&nbsp;it&#8217;s not fair. However, we are going through tough times and&nbsp;most nations are not respecting free trade rules&nbsp;&#8212; they&#8217;re applying trade barriers and&nbsp;tariff barriers,&#8221; he added. </p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/buy-america-clause-sparks-trade-war-talk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steel Slump Doesn&#8217;t Qualify as &#8216;Force Majeure&#8217; for Coal Contracts</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steel-slump-doesnt-qualify-as-force-majeure-for-coal-contracts</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steel-slump-doesnt-qualify-as-force-majeure-for-coal-contracts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Commodity Inspector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A&#160;Japanese steel producer said Monday that metallurgical coal buyers have accepted that sagging global steel demand doesn&#8217;t warrant the&#160;cancellation of&#160;all unwanted contract tonnage in&#160;the&#160;current fiscal year, but they are still holding out for&#160;suppliers to&#160;cancel some high-priced fiscal 2008 term deliveries. The&#160;source also said 2009 contract prices may have to&#160;be settled higher than in&#160;2007 to&#160;allow for&#160;long-term [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A&nbsp;Japanese steel producer said Monday that metallurgical coal buyers have accepted that sagging global steel demand doesn&#8217;t warrant the&nbsp;cancellation of&nbsp;all unwanted contract tonnage in&nbsp;the&nbsp;current fiscal year, but they are still holding out for&nbsp;suppliers to&nbsp;cancel some <nobr>high-priced</nobr> fiscal 2008 term deliveries. The&nbsp;source also said 2009 contract prices may have to&nbsp;be settled higher than in&nbsp;2007 to&nbsp;allow for&nbsp;<nobr>long-term</nobr> sustainability in&nbsp;met coal supplies.<br />
Representatives of&nbsp;market leader, BHP <nobr>Billiton-Mitsubishi</nobr> Alliance, kicked off FY 2009 talks with their North Asian customers in&nbsp;<nobr>late-January</nobr>, and&nbsp;have told buyers that &#8220;a&nbsp;contract is a&nbsp;contract,&#8221; the&nbsp;Japanese source said. BMA is expected to&nbsp;resume talks in&nbsp;Japan later this month, the&nbsp;source added.<br />
Previously, market sources said Asian steel mills are finding it difficult to&nbsp;take delivery of&nbsp;their outstanding contracted FY 2008 coal tonnages and&nbsp;buyers were hoping that the&nbsp;current situation could be considered a&nbsp;force majeure condition.<br />
EARLY 2008 PROJECTIONS MISSED THE&nbsp;MARK<br />
FY 2008 tonnages for&nbsp;annual contracts starting April 1 were procured at&nbsp;<nobr>record-high</nobr> prices in&nbsp;early 2008. Prime hard coking coals from Australia and&nbsp;Canada were priced at&nbsp;about $300/mt FOB, largely as&nbsp;a&nbsp;result of&nbsp;flooding in&nbsp;the&nbsp;main Australian metallurgical <nobr>coal-producing</nobr> state of&nbsp;Queensland in&nbsp;early 2008, and&nbsp;partly due to&nbsp;harsh winter conditions in&nbsp;Canada.<br />
In&nbsp;early calendar 2008, the&nbsp;metallurgical coal supply situation was extremely tight, forcing steelmakers to&nbsp;cough up high annual prices for&nbsp;their FY 2008 coal supplies. Mills also entered into contracts for&nbsp;additional tonnages on&nbsp;top of&nbsp;projected requirements for&nbsp;FY 2008 in&nbsp;anticipation of&nbsp;events that could further constrict supply&#8211;such as&nbsp;mine accidents, weather disturbances and&nbsp;equipment failure.<br />
Projections made in&nbsp;early 2008 were too optimistic and&nbsp;were overshadowed by&nbsp;the&nbsp;global financial meltdown, which started in&nbsp;<nobr>mid-September</nobr> and&nbsp;sent commodities pricing and&nbsp;freight rates on&nbsp;a&nbsp;downward spiral. For&nbsp;the&nbsp;mills, the&nbsp;financial crisis meant they had to&nbsp;cut down on&nbsp;their steel production. This put them in&nbsp;a&nbsp;quandary regarding how to&nbsp;deal with outstanding, <nobr>high-priced</nobr>, contracted 2008 tonnages that they no longer required.<br />
BMA LIKELY TO&nbsp;FIND PROPOSAL HARD TO&nbsp;SWALLOW<br />
In&nbsp;late January 2009, BMA informed its customers that FY 2008 contracts must be honored, the&nbsp;Japanese source said. However, buyers are still negotiating with their suppliers to&nbsp;reduce the&nbsp;delivery of&nbsp;a&nbsp;portion of&nbsp;their outstanding FY 2008 contracts.<br />
&#8220;We know this kind of&nbsp;proposal will be very hard for&nbsp;BMA and&nbsp;other suppliers to&nbsp;accept,&#8221; the&nbsp;Japanese source said. &#8220;We want to&nbsp;talk to&nbsp;our suppliers on&nbsp;a&nbsp;commercial basis, not on&nbsp;a&nbsp;legal basis,&#8221; the&nbsp;source added. The&nbsp;Japanese coal buyer also said that the&nbsp;FY 2007 price of&nbsp;$98/mt FOB for&nbsp;prime hard coking coal &#8220;is too low&#8221; as&nbsp;a&nbsp;price settlement for&nbsp;FY 2009. He said he personally believes that FY 2009 prices should settle at&nbsp;between the&nbsp;FY 2007 and&nbsp;FY 2008 prices, suggesting a&nbsp;price of&nbsp;$120 to&nbsp;$150/mt FOB.<br />
&#8220;We don&#8217;t want our suppliers to&nbsp;go under. We have to&nbsp;think of&nbsp;future availability of&nbsp;coking coal. Pressuring suppliers to&nbsp;agree to&nbsp;very low prices for&nbsp;2009 will not be good for&nbsp;buyers in&nbsp;the&nbsp;long term,&#8221; the&nbsp;source said. </p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices-steel/steel-slump-doesnt-qualify-as-force-majeure-for-coal-contracts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iron Ore Prices May Fall 50% on China Slowdown, Rinehart Says</title>
		<link>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/iron-ore-prices-may-fall-50-on-china-slowdown-rinehart-says</link>
		<comments>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/iron-ore-prices-may-fall-50-on-china-slowdown-rinehart-says#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices - Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron ore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forexhome.net/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iron ore contract prices may fall as&#160;much as&#160;50 percent this year amid a&#160;slowdown in&#160;China, the&#160;world&#8217;s biggest consumer of&#160;the&#160;raw material, according to&#160;Australia&#8217;s richest woman and&#160;mining magnate Gina Rinehart. &#8220;We&#8217;re hearing 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent discounts to&#160;last year&#8217;s contract price,&#8221; Rinehart, who controls closely held Hancock Prospecting Pty, said in&#160;an&#160;interview with Bloomberg Television. That compares [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron ore contract prices may fall as&nbsp;much as&nbsp;50 percent this year amid a&nbsp;slowdown in&nbsp;China, the&nbsp;world&#8217;s biggest consumer of&nbsp;the&nbsp;raw material, according to&nbsp;Australia&#8217;s richest woman and&nbsp;mining magnate Gina Rinehart.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re hearing 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent discounts to&nbsp;last year&#8217;s contract price,&#8221; Rinehart, who controls closely held Hancock Prospecting Pty, said in&nbsp;an&nbsp;interview with Bloomberg Television. That compares with the&nbsp;average forecast of&nbsp;a&nbsp;30 percent cut in&nbsp;a&nbsp;Bloomberg survey of&nbsp;11 analysts last week.<br />
Chinese steelmakers are likely to&nbsp;win their first cut in&nbsp;contract prices in&nbsp;seven years as&nbsp;a&nbsp;global recession curbs demand for&nbsp;commodities. Rinehart&#8217;s partner, Rio Tinto Group, the&nbsp;world&#8217;s <nobr>second-biggest</nobr> exporter of&nbsp;the&nbsp;ore, and&nbsp;Baosteel Group Corp. began talks this month to&nbsp;set prices from April 1, according to&nbsp;two company executives who asked not to&nbsp;be identified.<br />
&#8220;The&nbsp;economy in&nbsp;China is very sad right now,&#8221; Rinehart said. China&#8217;s economy may rebound soon and&nbsp;&#8221;ultimately, prices will rise,&#8221; she said. Hancock isn&#8217;t party to&nbsp;the&nbsp;talks.<br />
Hancock Prospecting is partner with Rio in&nbsp;the&nbsp;Hope Downs iron ore project in&nbsp;Western Australia. Hancock is also seeking to&nbsp;develop the&nbsp;Roy Hill iron ore mine in&nbsp;Western Australia.<br />
Rio, BHP Billiton Ltd., and&nbsp;Brazil&#8217;s Cia. Vale do Rio Doce, which handle <nobr>three-quarters</nobr> of&nbsp;traded iron ore, sell the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/category/commodity-prices-steel">steelmaking material</a> under <nobr>long-term</nobr> contracts to&nbsp;China&#8217;s 20 biggest mills and&nbsp;traders at&nbsp;agreed annual prices.<br />
China may be asking for&nbsp;a&nbsp;price cut of&nbsp;between 40 percent and&nbsp;45 percent, Macquarie Group Ltd. analysts led by&nbsp;<nobr>London-based</nobr> Jim Lennon said in&nbsp;a&nbsp;Jan. 12 report. UBS AG analysts have forecast a&nbsp;decline of&nbsp;40 percent. A&nbsp;30 percent cut would still be the&nbsp;second- highest price on&nbsp;record.</p>
Posted on <a href="http://www.commodityblog.com/">Commodity blog</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.commodityblog.com/commodity-prices/iron-ore-prices-may-fall-50-on-china-slowdown-rinehart-says/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

